Comments about pixel

There are 53 comments about "pixel"

James cashan: [[img:27964]] This may not read to well after reducing the pixels,but thought it was a charming story in the salford Advertiser a few weeks ago...

in response to: These Things No Longer Exist by Andrew Smith

James cashan: Thanks for the compliments Rob T. Norma B. and sheila V. (finally sussed out the pixel thing!)It is nice to feel a special connection to this public tribute ney icon of irlam and cadisheads` past......

in response to: These Things No Longer Exist by Andrew Smith

James cashan: hello, Thanks for the info andy is this your own site that you started up? I will be out snapping old and new local haunts when i get the chance,and will......

in response to: These Things No Longer Exist by Andrew Smith

Andrew Smith: Hi James, glad you want to add photos. If you want to add photo's first you'll need to resize them to no more than 600 pixels wide, in photoshop or the like. When typing your post in......

in response to: These Things No Longer Exist by Andrew Smith

EvilGentleman: You can scan film this well? I'm impressed. Whenever I have tried to scan 35mm film in the attachments for my scanners, I always get fuzzy pixellated crap that shows the image, but very poorly.......

in response to: Jan 09 2008 Toronto by hool

been: Oh, and it looks like you just caught the blink of the light on top of the stack. It's all of about one pixel big. Gives a speck of stark contrast....

in response to: On a Cloudy Day by Elicar

EvilGentleman: I always consider the 600 pixel size to be equivalent to a speed limit. If I keep it to 600 or less, I know I am safe. But if I go over, I run the......

in response to: July 30 2007 Toronto by hool

CE: You can make them more than 600 pixels? Hot Damn! No more small photos for me!...

in response to: July 30 2007 Toronto by hool

EvilGentleman: Oh, and if I remember correctly, the width of your photos was never an issue. It was the height. For the last year, I have been trying to keep my pictures' heights under 700 pixels......

in response to: July 30 2007 Toronto by hool

chiamattt: Both of you have convinced me to post pictures at 645 pixels wide from now on. awesome! Thanks you two!!!...

in response to: July 30 2007 Toronto by hool

chiamattt: Your pictures are 650pixels wide. FOR SHAME! Glad to see you posting again. These are great. I really like the first and second shots. Be cool...

in response to: July 30 2007 Toronto by hool

elaine: is it really true we have better phones than you? mine, the nokia n80 http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n80-1347.php fyi, has TWO yes TWO cameras on it! the secondary camera is designed with teenagers in mind i think and......

in response to: Silvery Paste Up by elaine

jack: how did you get such a big photo on 600 pixels, but the street and trolley lines are great, the angle, the distance, very good....

in response to: Eastern Ave at Night by jeeff

Denis: I wasn't able to send you my pictue of the Edmonton skyline...too big of a file.....can i send it to you through email for you to post.....or how do i get down to 600 migapixels......

in response to: The Top 10 Canadian Skylines by CE

EvilGentleman: Lea, you definitely have "the eye". Keep up the good work. And as far as your choice of photo editing software goes, I tend to do all my cropping and resizing with Microsoft Photo Editor......

in response to: Vancouver by Lea

anon (localhost): Hi Gerry If you press the upload photos which i guess you did. Then a page will open that reads upload photo,s. Then press Browse. Then find the Picture you what to upload in (your)My pictures. Then press upload. If the......

in response to: Barton Power Station by Dave

groovehouse: I bet it's like the Million Dollar Homepage [[http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/]], where someone has sold ad space on this building instead of pixels on a computer!...

in response to: Advertisements on Rietveld Art Acadamy by RobertR

EvilGentleman: You might need to change your resolution settings on your camera to a larger size. Are all your pictures this size even before you think of posting them on citynoise? If so, I see from......

in response to: The Last Bird by Biff

ksedge: jamie - i have the nokia 6265i. it has a 2 megapixel camera which is pretty good for a phone. that is until next week when i'm sure they'll come out with a 3/4/8 megapixel......

in response to: Camera Phone - Aug. 06 by ksedge

EvilGentleman: Wow! A set of real Flintstones low-res computer monitor screens with brick pixels....

in response to: I Assume You\'re Not Blind by Cosmo

Jamie: totally. the overall quality of a photo lies more in the person pressing the shutter release than it does in the quality of the equipment used. certainly a nice shiny lens helps a lot but......

in response to: Heidelberg Doll House by Cosmo

Editor: can you post bigger versions (600 pixels wide ideally) in the comments so we can replace these smaller ones?...

in response to: Godfather\'s Home by jack

joey: 650 x 433 pixels...

in response to: July 17 2006 Toronto by hool

Editor: Mofidious, here's a quick guide on how to post an article. **1.** Click "Post your own Citynoise" at the top of the page **2.** Fill in the form, author = your name, title = title for your......

in response to: Mofidious by Mofidious

Jamie: citynoise doesn't alter uploaded images in any way. it can't. i wish it could. what process are you using to get them off your camera and resize them to 600 pixels in width?...

in response to: No Sitting by Biff

phone: They make 5megapixel camera phones in Korea. The world is a marvelous place. ...

in response to: April 27th 2006: Cameraphone by Jamie

Jamie: [[img:11353]] further recursion at 600 pixels...

in response to: Brutalism by Tyfoid Kid

Elicar: Thanks Jamie. Being compared to Hool is a big compliment for me. I could only wish! Hool, if I have some postings that imitate your "ART", I apologize. I take pictures of things that I like......

in response to: Lost in Thought by Elicar

Jamie: [[img:11329]] recursion at 600 pixels...

in response to: Brutalism by Tyfoid Kid

Editor: Other thing to note that images over 600 pixels tend to push the site layout off the visible screen for people running lower screen resolutions. Also a good way of linking a series of posts......

in response to: Criminalize Greed, Not Graffiti by Peter

J: Um sorry about the pixelated images. I'm new at resizing and uploading photos...

in response to: A Grisly Example of Man\'s Inhumanity by GGP

grange: speaking of pic , i cant get mine to load to the site ,,,grrrrrr . Im new with the digital camera .how do i change to 600 pixels.. I contacted the web site but know......

in response to: Panning Turned into Stalking by Elicar

jeeff: the barbed wire helps. i wish i could get 2.7 megapixels out of my camera. recently it's been down to 0....

in response to: Saturday Walk by chiamattt

chiamattt: 2.7 megapixels of power brother!...

in response to: Saturday Walk by chiamattt

EvilGentleman: Still think the whole package would be better if he was also selling used books. Oh, and Peter, the cameraphone seems pretty good, but maybe it would be better to just buy a compact point-and-shoot......

in response to: Lunch Truck by Peter

jack: the brick work is beautiful. peter, there are homes on avenue t and east 4th street that have some beautiful brick work as well as one of them actually used in the godfather movie.......

in response to: Arched Entrance by Peter

interested!: i really like this picture, i feel that it gives you a different outlook, rather than the everyday things that we see. i also have one question how do i make my pix smaller......

in response to: Vanderbilt Avenue by Night by Peter

EvilGentleman: Thanks, Bigbri. The camera I used was a no-frills 3.2 megapixel Fuji Finepix A330, cuz it's all I can afford at the moment. I hope to upgrade to something better one of these days, and......

in response to: Kangirsujuaq by EvilGentleman

jeeff: i like the hobarts building. if you add a few pixels of feathering to your selections you can avoid the halo effect....

in response to: Corporate Structures... by joey

groovehouse: OH NO!! the button's not supposed to be that big! Hmmm... looks like the coding enlarges images on the home page. Button should be small, like 80 x 15 pixels....

in response to: Citynoise Button by groovehouse

elaine: this is lovely, u got a theme here, right enough. kc, the page width is 600 pixels (at 72dpi, i don't know if it makes a difference but i always do it anyway, that's screen dpi),......

in response to: Wires, Tree, Clouds, Sky by joey

jeeff: the part with the head (below the head really) is the thomas fisher rare book library. the oldest piece in their collection is a 1789 BC cuneiform tablet from ur. they have all......

in response to: a different perspective by jeeff

Paul G: Thanks! You guys kick ass. $5 = 100 miles, roughly. Special thanks to Jamie for the first donation. I need to verify with Paypal now, ugh! I am the proto-technotard. Raw......

in response to: Thorndale, Texas by Paul G

jamie: when you scan them in barry, you need to crop out the photo from the white background, then you cn resize that to 600 pixels wide and they should look much nicer for you...

in response to: Greece 2001 by barry

Jamie: yeah these are pretty massive, and will break the site for most visitors. Don't worry too much we'll sort them out for you. For future reference though we tend to keep pics to a maximum......

in response to: Banksy Photos + other graf by SpankyHam

jeeff: more in-depth answer: i use a wacom graphics tablet to allow me to draw onto my computer. i use adobe photoshop, corel painter and alias sketchbook pro for various functions. for reference, i......

in response to: space 1 by jeeff

Jamie: **fede:** i'm liking all the varied content you've been bringing us lately. thanks for posting here. i've resized your photos for you as they were WAY too large to display properly on most people screens.......

in response to: Italia by fede

Jamie: Dude it's ok, the site is supposed to resize them on the fly but things have gone a bit shonky for the time being. We can resize your current pics. Just be sure to keep......

in response to: The Bridges of New York City by Peter

Peter: steelisreal: same thing with my treo 600. i dug around on a forum amd found a hacked replacement for the cam software that includes a zoom as well as the ability to remove dark pixels......

in response to: World Trade Center Stop: Manhattan by Peter

Peter: yeah... im experimenting with some unofficial camera hacks. the cam ships in low-rez/low-filesize/non-zooming mode, with no ability to change those settings. the actual cam hardware, though, is capable of much more than how they engineered......

in response to: World Trade Center Stop: Manhattan by Peter

jamie: does your phone have a digital zoom? i'm noticing how some of your pics are a little pixelated compared to others...

in response to: World Trade Center Stop: Manhattan by Peter

hool: frakt: that first photo is probably too big for most people who view this site. i try to go no bigger than 600 pixels wide. just a minor note. thanks for the......

in response to: san francisco: cool paintings on the walls by frakt

.nl: 800 pixels can certainly be forgiven in this context ... a stunning shot from a great angle and perspective. a bird on the ground's eye view. or lying flat, face down, on the pavement. picking......

in response to: Intersection Reading by hool