![]() | ||
| What is Citynoise?..... Today's posts..... This month..... Recent Comments..... Contact..... RSS Feed.... Post your own Citynoise..... | ||
| http://www.citynoise.org | ||
browse by city
New York, NY (772) popular articles
Water Falls on the City recent articles
Heavy MTL 2008: Disturbed browse by author
Peter (784) hot topics
graffiti |
Freedom of Speech!
[previous] :: [next]
This article has been viewed 2306 times in the last 2 years joey: 9th Mar 2006 - 02:40 GMTthe same word is written all over our newspaper machines as well. there are more lies in the american media these days than anywhere in the world. jack: 9th Mar 2006 - 16:49 GMTthats true. i cant stand it. i hate lies. all politicians and newspaper people lie to get you to do what they want or make you believe what they want you to believe. something like when we meet new people or like what we said to our spouses when we were dating or that thing you bought that cost too much and what you said to your spouse to make them think you did it for them. S: 10th Mar 2006 - 21:24 GMTI'm afraid I have to disagree with you both Joey, you claim that there's more lies in the American media than anywhere else in the world. I'm just curious to know how you came to that conclusion?. If we had a scale of 1 to 10 that could measure "lies" in the media, I assume by your statement that the American media would be at the top. Where on the scale would you place the media from places such as Iraq and afghanistan? The general public from those sorts of places rarely hear the "truth". Jack, I think it's unfair to paint "all" politicans with the same brush. I don't disagree that liars exist in all levels of government, but to say that they are "all liars" is like saying that "all" automotive mechanics are crooks. I usually like to give them the benefit of the doubt.
grange: 12th Mar 2006 - 00:22 GMTS . I watched your media during the "war" and then switched to bbc .Balanced isnt a word i would use . To compare irag and afganistain to industrail nations is like comparing apples to horse shoes . You can try to fit a horse shoe on a apple but all ya get is apple sauce . Elicar: 12th Mar 2006 - 01:13 GMTYour First Amendment gives you the right to express your feelings, opinions, views, etc., Jack. Afterall, everything is all about perceptions. That's the beauty of free speech. You can say whatever you want, so long, as you are not maligning or threatening a specific person or organization. Use it while you still have it. You never know, it could be gone tomorrow! EvilGentleman: 12th Mar 2006 - 03:42 GMTWe all know that lies are the fabric upon which all governments are founded. It matters not whether the nation is a democracy or non-democracy, capitalist, socialist, communist, fascist, agrarian, theocracy or dictatorship. The one fundamental truth is the lack of truth. But at least we are all equal in this respect. I can lie as well as the rest of them, should I wish to do so. (or have I already done so? Truthfulness is in the ears of the listener, not on the lips of the speaker. Reality is relative.) grange: 12th Mar 2006 - 12:34 GMTFreedoms just another word for nothing left to lose .( janis Joplyn) Micah: 19th Mar 2006 - 03:08 GMTThe US is ranked 44th in the world for press freedom. #1 is a 7-way tie between Finland, Iceland, Norway, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Ireland. Canada is 21st (tied with Lithuania). Micah: 19th Mar 2006 - 03:09 GMToops tried to post a link but it didn't seem to work. If you really want to see it you'll have to copy-paste this: (Ed. - enclose a url with double square brackets to make it hotlink) Elicar: 19th Mar 2006 - 08:01 GMTInteresting ranking: 7 countries tied for rank 1, yet the next rank is 8, not 2. The ranking is based on the number of countries, rather than the results of their methodology. It did not consider the ties. If the ties were considered, Canada is # 8 and the US would be #25. Although it did note that the results were subjective because it is based perceptions, I wonder if the population was factored in the calculation of results. If it did not, the US did well as compared to two other populous countries, India and China. jeeff: 19th Mar 2006 - 08:44 GMTi don't think the size of a country's population would affect the ease of maintaining a free press too much. Elicar: 19th Mar 2006 - 13:55 GMTI could agree with you Jeeff, but because of the subjectivity of the methodology used in the ranking, it has a major impact on the result. "The survey asks questions about direct attacks on journalists and the media as well as other indirect sources of pressure against the free press." The more people to rile, up the more attactks! The more special interests, the more indirect pressures. Comment on this article..[previous] :: [next] |
search citynoise.orgrecent discussions
Kensington, Philadelphia - July 2004
from the archivesrecently viewed
Freedom of Speech! |
concept and content © citynoise.org 2002 - 2008 : designed and maintained by
jamie (jamazon.co.uk) and
peter (rhodamine.org)
caveat: entries and comments on citynoise.org represent
the views of their respective authors; this is an open forum, open to
all relevant ideas,
and as such, sees minimal editorial interference. as such, all content
on this site remains property of its creator/author, and is therefore
protected by all applicable copyright laws.
| ||